The ability to precisely identify and target individual users – what the industry calls “addressability”– has long been at the heart of digital marketing. Unlike traditional analog media, addressable media allows advertisers to create personalized experiences that resonate with users on a granular level. But in recent years, the rise of privacy regulations and platform-level changes like Apple’s ATT framework have all but ensured the demise of persistent, operating system-level identifiers, making this once-straightforward task significantly more complex.
Marketers are now facing a “back to the future” moment. As privacy concerns have grown, legions of pundits have joined the chorus of backlash against the so-called “surveillance economy,” declaring the third-party cookie a false prophet, overstepping its humble origins. In turn, numerous advertising platforms have heralded the return of contextual targeting, once considered a relic of the past, as the savior of digital advertising’s future. But while this approach has its place, it's not the messiah advertisers are looking for.
So, what do advertisers truly want? And, more importantly, how do they want to reach consumers? The truth is, even while there is a resurgence of contextual targeting chatter, advertising dollars have flooded into CTV and retail media networks - not because they’re revolutionary, but because they promise a preponderance of logged-in users and, therefore, index highly on addressability. For marketers – particularly brand advertisers – these channels offer more precision in targeting, making it easier for them to reach the right audience efficiently.
The ascendancy of “curation,” which is arguably the buzzword-du-jour, is the natural next step in the evolution of addressability. In simplest terms curation uses data signals to package inventory in a way that enhances targeting precision and efficiency. At its core, curation seeks to better understand the propensities and preferences of each individual user. That’s not to say there isn’t room for contextual targeting in this paradigm, but more often than not, curation involves targeting defined audience profiles. It allows marketers to refine their strategies and zero in on specific audience profiles—beyond just context. So, while context still has a role to play, audience-based curation is quickly becoming the go-to approach in today’s fragmented digital ecosystem.
Skeptics argue that “curation” is nothing more than “ad targeting” repackaged under a different name. It is just not that simple.
Ad targeting has traditionally been the domain of the buy-side of the ecosystem, with DSPs making the decision on which ad requests to bid. In contrast, curation entails the migration of targeting decisions to the sell-side of the industry. But why is sell-side curation suddenly becoming so popular? Let’s break it down:
There are compelling reasons why sell-side curation is increasingly taking hold:
Sell-side platforms have a unique advantage when it comes to addressing these inefficiencies:
Sell-side curation is poised to revolutionize how marketers reach their audiences. By improving targeting precision and reducing infrastructure costs, it offers a powerful solution to the challenges of modern advertising. However, full adoption of this strategy is still evolving.
In Part 2 of this conversation, we’ll delve into the reasons why some marketers are still hesitant to fully embrace sell-side curation —and how InMobi is working to address these concerns.
Register to our blog updates newsletter to receive the latest content in your inbox.